<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../assets/xml/rss.xsl" media="all"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tim Gorichanaz (Posts about Philosophy of Information)</title><link>http://timgorichanaz.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://timgorichanaz.com/categories/philosophy-of-information.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><language>en</language><copyright>Contents © 2021 &lt;a href="mailto:tim.gorichanaz@gmail.com"&gt;Tim Gorichanaz&lt;/a&gt; </copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:34:41 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>Nikola (getnikola.com)</generator><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><item><title>Information Experience in Theory and Design</title><link>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/infex/</link><dc:creator>Tim Gorichanaz</dc:creator><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://books.emeraldinsight.com/page/detail/Information-Experience-in-Theory-and-Design/?k=9781839093692" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://timgorichanaz.com/images/book-infex.png" style="max-width: 25%; float: right; padding: 0 0 20px 20px" alt="Information Experience in Theory and Design, by Tim Gorichanaz"&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my book &lt;a href="https://books.emeraldinsight.com/page/detail/Information-Experience-in-Theory-and-Design/?k=9781839093692"&gt;Information Experience in Theory and Design&lt;/a&gt; (2020, Emerald), I seek to reframe the discussion of information engagement through the lens of &lt;strong&gt;information experience&lt;/strong&gt;, an exciting emerging area within information science.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unlike traditional &lt;strong&gt;information behavior&lt;/strong&gt; research, which is limited to how people need, seek, and search for information, information experience looks at how people understand, use, and are shaped by information. As such, &lt;em&gt;information experience goes beyond identifying information sources to examine how people are informed by information—and not just “informed,” but formed and transformed&lt;/em&gt;. Thus, information experience shows the breadth of phenomena that are informative to people, beyond what is traditionally recognized as informative in library and information studies (e.g., books, articles). This means that information experience presents a way to overcome the limitations of earlier paradigms of information behavior. In this way, information experience connects with other human-centered areas of information research and design, including information literacy and human–computer interaction.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Offering a rigorous theoretical foundation for information experience and insights for design, this book brings together research from across the information field as well as philosophy. For researchers or students in any area of the information field, from librarianship to human–computer interaction, this is an exciting new text investigating a fascinating new field of study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/infex/"&gt;Read more…&lt;/a&gt; (11 min remaining to read)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Information Experience</category><category>Meaning</category><category>Philosophy of Information</category><category>Self</category><category>Understanding</category><guid>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/infex/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Understanding and Information in the Work of Visual Artists</title><link>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/understandingartists/</link><dc:creator>Tim Gorichanaz</dc:creator><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class="preprint"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gorichanaz, T. (2020). &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24286"&gt;Understanding and information in the work of visual artists&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Journal
of the Association for Information Science &amp;amp; Technology, 71&lt;/em&gt;(6), 685–695.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract&lt;/strong&gt;. To better account for information behavior in everyday life, the field
must more fully explore information phenomena in the lifeworld, i.e.,
information experience. This paper shows that one way to do this is
through the concept of understanding. Visual art is identified as an
illuminating domain for an initial foray into such research. This paper
presents findings from a phenomenology-of-practice study of the
information behavior of visual artists. Seven local artists documented
their experiences creating self-portraits, and semi-structured follow-up
interviews were conducted. The findings show how these participants
built understanding with information in their work of creating
individual self-portraits. These understandings fall into two
categories: of the self and of the artistic process. Many forms of
information, traditional and novel, contribute to these understandings;
examples of the latter include memories, the lived environment, profound
experiences, and online browsing. These findings extend the literature
on artists' information behavior, connect everyday information behavior
to information experience, and illustrate a method for studying
understanding empirically in information science. The paper closes by
discussing the meaning of these findings for the future of information
science, suggesting that the kinds of information employed by artists
might be recognized and appreciated more widely throughout society.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/understandingartists/"&gt;Read more…&lt;/a&gt; (42 min remaining to read)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Aesthetics</category><category>Art</category><category>Phenomenology</category><category>Philosophy of Information</category><category>Understanding</category><guid>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/understandingartists/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Information Experience in Personally Meaningful Activities</title><link>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/experiencemeaning/</link><dc:creator>Tim Gorichanaz</dc:creator><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class="preprint"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gorichanaz, T. (2019). &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24142"&gt;Information experience in personally meaningful activities&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Journal of the Association for Information Science &amp;amp; Technology, 70&lt;/em&gt;(12), 1302–1310.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract&lt;/strong&gt;. Information behavior in activities that are freely chosen has been
little explored. This paper conceptualizes personally meaningful
activities as a site for information behavior research. Personal meaning
is discussed as a necessity for human being. In the information age,
there is an ethical directive for developers of information technology
to promote and afford personally meaningful activities. This paper
builds on discussions of the pleasurable and profound in information
science conceptually and empirically. First, it argues for the necessity
of phenomenology in these discussions, which heretofore has been mostly
absent. Next, it presents results from a qualitative, empirical study on
information in personally meaningful activities. The empirical study
uses interpretative phenomenological analysis to examine information
experience in three domains of personal meaning: Bible reading,
ultramarathon running, and art-making. The following themes emerge and
are discussed: identity, central practice, curiosity, and presence.
Opportunities for technological development and further research are
outlined.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/experiencemeaning/"&gt;Read more…&lt;/a&gt; (35 min remaining to read)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Aesthetics</category><category>Personal Meaning</category><category>Phenomenology</category><category>Philosophy of Information</category><category>Understanding</category><guid>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/experiencemeaning/</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Applied Epistemology and Understanding in Information Studies</title><link>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/appliedepistemology/</link><dc:creator>Tim Gorichanaz</dc:creator><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class="preprint"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gorichanaz, T. (2017). &lt;a href="http://InformationR.net/ir/22-4/paper776.html"&gt;Applied epistemology and understanding in information studies&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Information Research, 22&lt;/em&gt;(4), paper 776.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Introduction:&lt;/em&gt; Applied epistemology allows information studies to benefit from developments in philosophy. In information studies, epistemic concepts are rarely considered in detail. This paper offers a review of several epistemic concepts, focusing on understanding, as a call for further work in applied epistemology in information studies. &lt;em&gt;Method:&lt;/em&gt; A hermeneutic literature review was conducted on epistemic concepts in information studies and philosophy. Relevant research was retrieved and reviewed iteratively as the research area was refined. &lt;em&gt;Analysis:&lt;/em&gt; A conceptual analysis was conducted to determine the nature and relationships of the concepts surveyed, with an eye toward synthesizing conceptualizations of understanding and opening future research directions. &lt;em&gt;Results:&lt;/em&gt; The epistemic aim of understanding is emerging as a key research frontier for information studies. Two modes of understanding (hermeneutic and epistemological) were brought into a common framework. &lt;em&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/em&gt; Research on the concept of understanding in information studies will further naturalistic information research and provide coherence to several strands of philosophic thought.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/appliedepistemology/"&gt;Read more…&lt;/a&gt; (47 min remaining to read)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Philosophy of Information</category><category>Understanding</category><guid>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/appliedepistemology/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Conceptualizing Self-Documentation</title><link>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/concepselfdoc/</link><dc:creator>Tim Gorichanaz</dc:creator><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class="preprint"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gorichanaz, T. (In press, 2019). Conceptualizing self-documentation. &lt;em&gt;Online Information Review, 43&lt;/em&gt;(7), 1352–1461.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Purpose&lt;/strong&gt;: Self-documentation is an increasingly common phenomenon,
but it is not yet well understood. This paper provides a philosophical
framework for analyzing examples of self-documentation on the dimensions
of ontology, epistemology and ethics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design/methodology/approach&lt;/strong&gt;: The framework addresses these three
major areas of philosophic thought by operationalizing insights from
philosophy, chiefly the work of Martin Heidegger. Heidegger's concepts
of authenticity and fallenness inform the poles of each dimension of the
framework.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings&lt;/strong&gt;: Ontologically, self-documentation may manifest as document
(authentic) or data (fallen); epistemologically, as understanding
(authentic) or idle curiosity (fallen); and ethically, as self-care
(authentic) or diversion (fallen). These dimensions are presented
separately but are understood to be intermingled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Originality/value&lt;/strong&gt;: This unified framework offers a lens for
examining and comparing cases of self-documentation and self-documents.
No such framework has previously been articulated, but given the
ubiquity and growing importance of self-documentation, it is needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Keywords&lt;/strong&gt;: self-tracking, autobiography, document, philosophy of
information, phenomenology&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/concepselfdoc/"&gt;Read more…&lt;/a&gt; (25 min remaining to read)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Philosophy of Information</category><category>Self-Documentation</category><category>Understanding</category><guid>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/concepselfdoc/</guid><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Information and Experience, a Dialogue</title><link>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/dialogue/</link><dc:creator>Tim Gorichanaz</dc:creator><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class="preprint"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gorichanaz, T. (2017). &lt;a href="http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JD-09-2016-0114"&gt;Information and experience, a dialogue&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Journal of Documentation, 73&lt;/em&gt;(3), 500–508.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Purpose:&lt;/em&gt; Scholars in information science have recently become interested in “information experience,” but it remains largely unclear why this research is important and how it fits within the broader disciplinary structure of information science. The purpose of this paper is to clarify this issue. &lt;em&gt;Approach:&lt;/em&gt; The discussion unfolds in the form of a philosophical dialogue between the Epistemologist, who represents the traditional and majority epistemological viewpoint of information science, and the Aestheticist, representing the emerging paradigm of experiential information inquiry. &lt;em&gt;Findings:&lt;/em&gt; A framework emerges that recognizes dual conceptualizations of truth (veritas and aletheia) and consequently information and knowledge (gnostic and pathic). The epistemic aim of understanding is revealed as the common ground between epistemology and aesthetics. &lt;em&gt;Value:&lt;/em&gt; The value of studying human experiences of information is grounded in work spanning philosophy, psychology and a number of social science methodologies, and it is contextualized within information science generally. Moreover, the dialogic format of this paper presents an opportunity for disciplinary self-reflection and offers a touch of heart to the field.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/dialogue/"&gt;Read more…&lt;/a&gt; (23 min remaining to read)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Aesthetics</category><category>Phenomenology</category><category>Philosophy of Information</category><category>Understanding</category><guid>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/dialogue/</guid><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2017 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Documents and Time</title><link>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/documentstime/</link><dc:creator>Tim Gorichanaz</dc:creator><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class="preprint"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gorichanaz, T. (2016). &lt;a href="http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/docam/vol3/iss1/7"&gt;Documents and time&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Proceedings from the Document Academy, 3&lt;/em&gt;(1), paper 7.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract&lt;/strong&gt;. This essay offers a philosophical account of time and documents. It first presents a number of theories of time and discusses how time has been applied in research on documents to date. These applications have been limited by their conceptualization of time as a physical entity. In order to extend our understanding of documental time, this paper draws from Heidegger's experiential theory of time and the theory of document transaction in order to introduce a theory of documental time. In documental time, the past and future of the person and the past and future of the object cohere in a shared present. The special case of numinous document experiences—and numinous time—is also explored.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/documentstime/"&gt;Read more…&lt;/a&gt; (20 min remaining to read)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Phenomenology</category><category>Philosophy of Information</category><guid>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/documentstime/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>How the Document Got Its Authority</title><link>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/documentauthority/</link><dc:creator>Tim Gorichanaz</dc:creator><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class="preprint"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gorichanaz, T. (2016). &lt;a href="http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/JD-09-2015-0117"&gt;How the document got its authority&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Journal of Documentation, 72&lt;/em&gt;(2), 299–305.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract&lt;/strong&gt;. &lt;em&gt;Purpose:&lt;/em&gt; To invite further consideration of and research into the authoritativeness, reliability and trustworthiness of documents. How do documents come to be trusted? Why are some more trusted than others? &lt;em&gt;Approach:&lt;/em&gt; The cases of the OED and Wikipedia policies are explored from a historical perspective, and other cases are considered. &lt;em&gt;Findings:&lt;/em&gt; Authoritativeness seems inherent to documents because of a cognitive metaphor that says "what is persistent is trustworthy". &lt;em&gt;Practical implications:&lt;/em&gt; This feature of documents exposes users to a number of pitfalls related to trusting illegitimate documents. This has important implications for document literacy. &lt;em&gt;Value:&lt;/em&gt; New insight into documents is achieved by applying cognitive metaphors and prototype theory to documents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/documentauthority/"&gt;Read more…&lt;/a&gt; (13 min remaining to read)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Document Theory</category><category>Philosophy of Information</category><guid>http://timgorichanaz.com/writings/Academic/documentauthority/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>